Since Prague, we’ve started to use names & phrase like Status Network, DAO, NAO, Status GmbH to represent the future how Status will be organized. I thought it might be useful to consider those names/alternatives before they become too engrained in our communications. There are two distinct names/brands we’re looking for IMO:
An overarching name for the collection of groups/entities/people that are focused on advancing the Status principles, and achieving our mission. Currently we’re using “Status Network” (which I personally like) although as Jarrad has pointed out, there may be an advantage to using a name that is not associated with the Status brand.
A specific name for the “Status GmbH” - the collection of Core Contributors that will be focused on delivering the whitepaper (see here for more details).
#1. Currently: “Status Network”
- Status Network
- Status DAO
- Status NAO (Networked Autonomous Organisation).
#2. Currently: “Status Gmbh”
- Status GmbH
- Status Research and Development
- Status Genesis
- Status Origin
- Status One
- Status Enterprise